What custom parts do the teams manufacture?
Rookie
Total Posts: 7
Joined 03/16/2008
Ultimate Insider
Total Posts: 925
Joined
Abnormal User
Total Posts: 1120
Joined
Abnormal User
Total Posts: 3276
Joined
There are still plenty of "gray" areas for teams to exploit as well as areas where teams do some minor cheating.
Signature:
Remembering the coming back and not crying about the leaving. And remembering the falling down and the laughter of the curse of luck, from all those son’s of $%^&*# who said we’d never get back up - Robert Earl Keen
Rookie
Total Posts: 32
Joined 06/13/2008
Q. June is the month of short‑track racing for the Indy Car Series, first Milwaukee and then Iowa and Richmond. You've had a strong qualifying run at Milwaukee, so what do you feel about the short ovals suits your driving style best?
WILL POWER: Well, it's not only the driving style it's also the fact that you're running maximum downforce. I think where these other guys have got us is all of the work they've done on wind tunnel and wheel bearings, coatings for the gear box and all of those little things that add up to the mile‑and‑a‑half or two‑mile‑an‑hour they have over us on the faster ovals.
I get the feeling that trying to get lowest friction bearings is almost as important as wind tunnel time. I've noticed differences in rear wing endplates as well as front wings as somebody mentioned. Helmet designs differ also, another poster has said that could mean up to 2-3 HP or about .1-.16 MPH difference.
There's also an interview somewhere that Dale Coyne mentions things like lightweight wheels and the adjustable wheelbase of the dallara. Can't find it right now.
Places where you see failures have generally been areas where the teams have some freedom. Justin Wilson's A-arm failure at Texas, Penske rear wing mounts at Milwaukee, the AGR wheel bearing failures of a few years back, Dale Coyne's and AGR's mirror mounts.
Ultimate Insider
Total Posts: 669
Joined
That's just off the top of my head of course
Signature:
”I LOVE IT. GOD HELP ME I DO LOVE IT SO."-General George S Patton
Ultimate Insider
Total Posts: 997
Joined
Hmmm...I think what you're looking at here is a spec that is not frozen but is VERY tight. The pre DP01 CART/CHAMP regulations laid down certain parameters but anything within those limits was permissable. An N/H mech told me for instance that you could use any kind of wing you wanted as long as it fit inside an imaginary box of certain dimensions. The IRL regs are a lot tighter than that, and all parts probably have to be approved. Unlike Champ Car's DP01 spec, however, changes can be made. Pretty minor and subtle ones, they don't make much difference in performance. On a high banked oval however, those slight differences can make big differences in finishing position. On road courses, the small advantages are swallowed up by bigger differences of setup and driver skill.
That's just off the top of my head of course
I thought the DP01 couldn't be played with. What you got from Panoz was what you had to run and it all came down to driver and setup.
Signature:
“My mom would kill me if she knew I was driving 232mph"-Dan Wheldon
Ultimate Insider
Total Posts: 669
Joined
I think that's what I said.Hmmm...I think what you're looking at here is a spec that is not frozen but is VERY tight. The pre DP01 CART/CHAMP regulations laid down certain parameters but anything within those limits was permissable. An N/H mech told me for instance that you could use any kind of wing you wanted as long as it fit inside an imaginary box of certain dimensions. The IRL regs are a lot tighter than that, and all parts probably have to be approved. Unlike Champ Car's DP01 spec, however, changes can be made. Pretty minor and subtle ones, they don't make much difference in performance. On a high banked oval however, those slight differences can make big differences in finishing position. On road courses, the small advantages are swallowed up by bigger differences of setup and driver skill.
That's just off the top of my head of course
I thought the DP01 couldn't be played with. What you got from Panoz was what you had to run and it all came down to driver and setup.
Signature:
”I LOVE IT. GOD HELP ME I DO LOVE IT SO."-General George S Patton
Abnormal User
Total Posts: 3276
Joined
Signature:
Remembering the coming back and not crying about the leaving. And remembering the falling down and the laughter of the curse of luck, from all those son’s of $%^&*# who said we’d never get back up - Robert Earl Keen
Ultimate Insider
Total Posts: 936
Joined
I don't believe parts HAVE to be approved. For instance I do not think that Penske got approval for the rear wing mounts and if you bring a new wing endplate it doesn't have to be approved.
exactly right. let's site meiras' accidents a little while ago at two separate tracks when the upper a's failed. both done in house. andretti /green does all of theirs in house. they do all of their gearbox work inhouse and all of their cv's. andretti and penske are apart from the norm though. everyone else buys their ancillaries from dallara and x-tracs.
Rookie
Total Posts: 32
Joined 06/13/2008
I) It was very noticeable how much straight-line speed Briscoe and even RHR had compared to J. Wilson. On further inspection of some photos I noticed how much more downforce JW had. Notice the difference in gurney flaps(I think they are called) on the front wings... yikes. This seems to be a case of a better shock/damper package leading to less needed downforce.


II) How is it that Will Power was running at the end of the race when he not only made contact with someone else during the Wheldon/Doornbos incident, but got airborne and had quite an impact with the ground?
Wish I could find footage online, but no luck.
EDIT: Found it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_38CJPzwrQ
The air Power caught was less than I remember, but he apparently still survived the impact with Wheldon while Andretti wasn't able to.
New Post
Hot Topic
New Poll
Moved Topic
Sticky Topic
No New Post
Old Hot Topic
Old Poll
Announcement
Closed Topic


